From e.e-owner@visionplants.org Thu Dec 13 07:43:06 2001
Return-Path: <e.e-owner@visionplants.org>
Received: from mta576.mail.yahoo.com (mta576.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.105])
	by mail2.thuntek.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id fBDEh6J31082
	for <valor@global-dialog.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:43:06 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from e.e-owner@visionplants.org)
Received: from mta576.mail.yahoo.com for valor@global-dialog.org; Dec 13 06:43:05 2001 -0800
X-Track: 3: 40
X-Yahoo-Forwarded: from eedonut@yahoo.com to valor@global-dialog.org
Received: from 207.153.90.205  (EHLO visionplants.org) (207.153.90.205)
  by mta576.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2001 06:43:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from priv-edtnes11-hme0.telusplanet.net [199.185.220.238] by visionplants.org with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-6.04) id AE6C63021E; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:42:52 -0500
Received: from [207.102.34.14] ([207.102.34.59])
          by priv-edtnes11-hme0.telusplanet.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.01 201-253-122-122-101-20011014) with ESMTP
          id <20011213144250.TJPV23043.priv-edtnes11-hme0.telusplanet.net@[207.102.34.14]>
          for <e.e@visionplants.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2001 07:42:50 -0700
X-Sender: a5b43805@POP.telus.net
Message-Id: <v04003a25b83e6d9f5981@[207.102.34.14]>
In-Reply-To: <20011213075946.88588.qmail@web12603.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20011213064258.1901.qmail@web12604.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 06:40:44 -0800
To: e.e@visionplants.org
From: Linda <haironfire@telus.net>
Subject: corporations are anti-life       was -- Re: EE:  nice writing (&erotic rocks)
Precedence: bulk
Sender: e.e-owner@visionplants.org
Reply-To: e.e@visionplants.org
Status: RO

>some nice writing:
>
>http://www.geocities.com/pa_hodges/front.htm

Evan that's a great looking site, and note the Burning Man stuff...

also, this re corporations!!!! (I had pushed the idea of corps. as
backwaters where psychopaths can really wreak havoc with broad effects
across populations....)


http://www.geocities.com/pa_hodges/nocorp.htm


The Corporation:  An Evolutionary Dead End?
 
I always listen to talk about artificial life with a little mirth.  The way
I look at it, we have already spawned  a line of artificial beings: 
corporations. 

<snip>
Darwin explains survival of the fittest as a process of "natural
selection"; the fittest are those chosen by Nature to survive. 
<snip>
It just so happens, however, that modern scientists have found that Mutual
Aid is exactly how nature works. There are many examples but one of my
favorites is a test for artificial intelligence called "The Two Prisoner
Problem."  It is a simple test, but from a small change in starting
conditions a vast number of outcomes are possible:  So many possibilities
that the system is considered unpredictable, or chaotic. Since chaos is the
nature of nature , chaos theory is used to model evolution, and the test
was designed by scientists to mimic the process of evolution.
 
The test goes like this:  Two men have committed a crime. They are taken to
the jailhouse and asked one at a time who committed the crime.  If one rats
the other guy out, the other guy stays in prison.  Whoever stays out of
prison is considered to have done better on the test. They are a "success"
and chosen by nature.   The answer, of course, is for both prisoners to not
say a word and  both get out.  We know this because our brains are also
chaos computers and we can figure it out rather quickly.  Writing a
computer program that has to learn and adapt to pass the test serves to
formalize Kropotkin's idea within the mathematical theory:  It gives a
scientific mathematical model of mutual aid in action.
 
The structure of DNA, the growth of cells, our heartbeats and brain waves,
even the orbits of planets are all modeled by chaos theory with Kropotkin's
"mutual aid" built in to the process.  It would appear God is an
anarchist.  Nature is by design chaotic and self-organising.  The key to
success is for autonomous actors to co-operate and adapt to a changing
environment. 
 
You might notice that corporations, however, don't really fit this model: 
Instead of self-organising from co-operation of the parts, the parts are
forced into order through domination.  Corporations are centrally
controlled, whereas the universe is formed of autonomous actors.  Where
nature strives towards ever greater complexity, the corporate model
obliterates the opposition and extends uniformity.  Instead of adapting to
the environment, corporations destroy the environment. 

etc.


